Skip to main content



New Jersey Schools Construction Corporation v. Lopez

412 N.J. Super. 298, 990 A.2d 667 (App. Div. 2010)

CONDEMNATION — Merely receiving notice that a condemning authority is considering the purchase an owner’s property does not preclude the owner from continuing with its development and construction of the property and, if condemnation takes place, the value of any such improvements must be considered in awarding just compensation for the condemnation of the property.

Right after taking title to its property, the new owner demolished a building on the property. The owner then used the property as a parking lot, but intended to develop the property as a mixed use building. The planning board denied the owner’s application because a use variance was needed. Around the time the owner applied for a use variance, the New Jersey Schools Construction Corporation (SCC) adopted a facilities management plan calling for the acquisition of property for construction of a school. The SCC sent the property owner a Notice of Intent (NOI) advising the owner that it was considering such a purchase. The NOI clearly stated that it was not to be construed as an offer to purchase the property. Several weeks later, the owner appeared before the zoning board in connection with its variance application. The owner did not disclose that it received the NOI from SCC. The owner’s variance application was approved and it commenced construction of the mixed use building. Then, the municipality’s board of education approved the acquisition of the property.

By the time the municipality made an offer to buy the property, the building was 80 percent complete. The municipality’s offer, which valued the land without the new improvements, was rejected. The lower court rejected the municipality’s claim that the value of the new improvements should have been excluded from any price determination. The parties settled and set the property’s value with the improvements, subject to the municipality’s right to appeal the inclusion of the improvements in the property’s valuation.

The municipality appealed, arguing that the value of the improvements should have been excluded from the determination of “just compensation” for the taking, because the owner had received the NOI before it received its zoning approvals and it failed to disclose that fact to the zoning board. The Appellate Division found that the owner’s receipt of an NOI was not sufficient notice of the municipality’s imminent intent to condemn the property so as to trigger the owner’s obligation to either notify the zoning board or abandon development of the property. The Court held that a property owner may continue to utilize and develop its property even though it is aware of condemnation plans, and that “plotting and planning in anticipation of condemnation without physical appropriation of interference does not constitute a taking.” A property owner is entitled to just compensation for the value of improvements unless the improvements are made in bad faith for the sole purpose of enhancing a condemnation award. In this case, the lower court found that there was no clear indication of the municipality’s intent to condemn the owner’s property and therefore the owner’s zoning board application and construction were not in bad faith. The Court agreed with the owner that the NOI was only a notification that the property was one of many properties being considered for acquisition and not evidence of imminent condemnation. Further, it noted that the NOI specifically stated that it was not to be construed as a formal offer to purchase the owner’s property and that the SCC may have decided not to acquire the property. In addition, the condemnation complaint was not filed until fifteen months after the NOI was sent and after the zoning board approvals were received. Therefore, the Court agreed that the owner’s construction of improvements was not in bad faith and that the value of the improvements had to be considered in awarding just compensation for the condemnation of the property.


MEISLIK & MEISLIK
66 Park Street • Montclair, New Jersey 07042
tel: 973-783-3000 • fax: 973-744-5757 • info@meislik.com