Case Law Summaries

Karlsson v. Vaynshetyn

• Opinion Date: May 31, 2001
• Real Property Law
• E-Mail

LIABILITY; GUESTS—Where a guest is aware of a dangerous condition or by reasonable use of the guest’s facilities would observe it, the host is not liable.

While drunk, a social guest fell down a staircase in the home of her host. Apparently, she reached for the handrail to “steady [her]self.” She “could not grip” the handrail and lost her balance. She asserted that it was dark at the top of the stairs and no one warned her about the stairs or handrail. In addition, the handrail did not extend to the top of the steps. She had been upstairs in her host’s house on one or two prior occasions where she had to use the staircase. The lower court concluded that the handrail was “observable” and that there were no “latent defects” for which the homeowner had to provide a warning to its guests. The Appellate Division upheld the lower court’s dismissal of the suit on summary judgment, adding: “The law is well settled regarding the duty a host owes to a social guest as to conditions of the property. The duty is limited. A host need only warn ‘of dangerous conditions of which [the host] had actual knowledge and of which the guest is unaware.’ ... A ‘host need not undertake to make improvements or alterations to render his home safer for those accepting his hospitality than for himself.’ ... The host is under no duty to inspect his or her premises to discover defects which otherwise might not be known to the casual observer. ... Where a ‘guest is aware of the dangerous condition or by a reasonable use of his facilities would observe it, the host is not liable.’”

Copyright ©2003. Meislik & Meislik. All rights reserved.