LEASES— Annual renewals of leases that provide for such renewals are not new leases, but constitute the same lease.
FORECLOSURE; NOTICE —Where a mortgagor who promises to reside in a home within a given period after a loan closes fails to do so, it can not complain when the lender serves a foreclosure complaint, especially where the borrower has actual knowledge of the suit.
LANDLORD-TENANT; DAMAGES—It is the Landlord’s burden to show that the rent charged to a replacement tenant following the original tenant’s lease default is commercially reasonable.
LANDLORD-TENANT; EVICTION —Having a certificate of occupancy is not required before rent can be collected and the owner-occupied exception to the Anti-Eviction statute does not require that the owner maintain his or her principal residence at the house.
LEASES— Where a lease of only part of a property requires the tenant to pay tax increases without further elaboration, it is a reasonable interpretation that the tenant is responsible for only its proportionate share.
LEASES— A court cannot change the terms of a lease provision without clear evidence that the parties actually reached an agreement to make such a change.
LEASES— It is not sufficient for a tenant to show that for a long time it acted in accordance with the terms of a purported lease. A court must examine all of the circumstances surrounding the purported lease to see if it is authentic and not a forgery.
LANDOWNER’S LIABILITY; SIDEWALKS— A predecessor in title who has created or maintained a dangerous sidewalk condition remains liable to an injured pedestrian irrespective of the fact that the property has been conveyed.
LANDOWNER’S LIABILITY; MALLS— Absent some other negligence on its part, if a shopping mall makes reasonable efforts to discover and clean up customer-created spills, it will not be liable for an injury caused by such a spill.
LANDOWNER’S LIABILITY; INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS— Where it was foreseeable that an independent contractor-worker, not engaged to repair a roof, could fall through a defective portion of a roof while working on another aspect of a project, a property owner was found to have had a non-delegable duty to inspect the roof and warn the worker of any defect discovered.